Job ticket 625764 · smb · copydesk · no subscription
Jasper charges US$59 a seat to store two descriptions of how you write.
This page is a copydesk. Paste three samples of your real writing and a free-tier model distills the voice sheet — rhythm rules, vocabulary, banned list, the tell, each rule evidenced by your own quoted sentences — as a portable file that works in any model, uncapped. Then paste the sheet with an offer's facts and get the campaign deck: hero, three emails, two posts, every claim traced, fake scarcity banned. Brand Voice was always a paste; now it's yours.
Jasper is a trademark of Jasper AI, Inc. This is an independent, unaffiliated comparison built on Jasper's own pricing page, linked below and re-read every thirty days.
Style card + galleys — rendered in this browser
Sample data is illustrative, not a claim about Jasper. Every Jasper figure on this page comes from the linked pricing page, read 2026-09-27.
The prompt pack
Two prompts, each mapped one-to-one onto a Jasper feature you are currently rationed on. Run them from this page with a free key, or copy them into any free chat model — the text is identical either way, and it is printed in full at the bottom of this section so it survives this site.
Loading the pack from tools.json… If this fails, the full prompt text is still readable below.
One-time unlocks only, never a subscription. If a price ever appears here it was read from Stripe in that request, not typed by hand. An unlock is client-side gating, not secure payment verification: it is stored in this browser and cannot prove payment to anyone else.
What Jasper's own pricing page says
Read from jasper.ai/pricing on 2026-09-27. Fields we could not read are marked unconfirmed rather than filled in with a plausible number.
| The job | Jasper (7-day trial) | Pro (US$59/seat/mo annual) | This page + a free-tier model |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | US$0 for 7 days | US$59 /seat/mo billed annually, US$69 monthly | US$0 forever. A free-tier key costs nothing; the prompts are yours. |
| Brand voices | Trial access | 2 on Pro — the meter is the feature | Prompt 1 distills as many voice sheets as you have voices; files don't count seats |
| On-brand campaign copy | Trial access | Generation inside their app | Prompt 2's deck: every line answerable to the sheet, every claim traced to your facts |
| Where the voice lives | Their workspace | Their workspace, per seat | In a file you own — portable to any model, any teammate, any decade |
What this replaces, and what it does not
A displacement claim you cannot substantiate is a lie with good typography. This is the whole scope, including the parts where Jasper wins.
Replaced: voice capture
The evidence-ruled sheet: rhythm, vocabulary, banned list, the tell, a self-proving test paragraph — Jasper's Brand Voice as a document with receipts.
Replaced: the campaign set
Hero, announce, objection, last-call, two posts — the working copy set, in voice, grounded, with fake scarcity structurally banned.
Replaced: the seat math
One writer or nine: prompts and files scale by paste, not by US$59 multiplications.
NOT the platform
No chat workspace, no browser extension, no image generation, no workflow automation, no analytics. Jasper the product is much bigger than its two load-bearing primitives; this desk ships the primitives.
NOT a claim machine
The deck cannot cite customers you don't have or results you didn't state. Copy that lies is a refund generator with nice rhythm.
NOT this catalog's email/social desks
The Mailchimp desk plans email programs; the Buffer desk builds posting queues. This desk builds the voice asset they consume — different object, on purpose.
The prompts, in full, as text
Copy these into any model. They are the product; the page around them is convenience. Each block is the exact system prompt the interactive runner sends, plus the user-message template.
Prompt 01 — 1. Brand voice sheet · jasper-voice-sheet v1.0.0 · best ally: Google Gemini API — Free usage tier · gemini-2.5-flash-lite
Replaces: Jasper's Brand Voice feature — capped at 2 on the US$59-69 Pro seat — as a portable document distilled from your own writing, uncapped forever.
Why this model: Distillation must quote real samples as evidence for every rule it writes — a whole-context read with structured output, which is Gemini's free-tier home turf; temperature stays moderate because the rules must describe the samples, not improve on them. Fallback ally: Copy-Paste Relay.
System prompt (2313 chars):
You distill a brand's voice from writing samples into a portable voice sheet. You describe the voice that exists — you do not invent a better one. Every rule you write must be evidenced by a verbatim quote from the samples.
Return ONLY one JSON object. No markdown fences, no commentary, no preamble.
{
"title": string (max 8 words: '<Name> voice sheet' if a name was given),
"blocks": [
{ "type": "p", "text": string (max 40 words: the voice in one paragraph a new writer could hold in mind) },
{ "type": "h2", "text": "Rhythm rules" },
{ "type": "ul", "items": [ string (2-4 entries, max 22 words each: sentence-length habits, paragraph shape, punctuation tics — each with a quoted fragment as evidence) ] },
{ "type": "h2", "text": "Vocabulary" },
{ "type": "ul", "items": [ string (3-6 entries, max 18 words each: words/constructions the voice reaches for, quoted; and the register it stays in) ] },
{ "type": "h2", "text": "Banned list" },
{ "type": "ul", "items": [ string (3-6 entries, max 14 words each: phrases and moves this voice never makes — from the samples' own avoidances plus the owner's stated hates) ] },
{ "type": "h2", "text": "The tell" },
{ "type": "p", "text": string (max 35 words: the single most identifying habit — the thing a reader could recognize the brand by, with its quote) },
{ "type": "h2", "text": "Test paragraph" },
{ "type": "p", "text": string (max 60 words: one NEW paragraph about a neutral topic (a delayed shipment), written in the voice, so future writers can calibrate against it) },
{ "type": "callout", "text": string (max 30 words: how to use this sheet — paste it before any copy prompt in any model; it replaces a per-seat subscription's stored voice) }
]
}
Hard rules:
1. Every rhythm and vocabulary rule quotes the samples verbatim. A rule with no evidence does not get written.
2. Describe, don't aspire: if the samples are plain, the sheet says plain and makes plainness executable. No upgrading the brand to 'bold and dynamic'.
3. The banned list includes marketing clichés ONLY if the samples actually avoid them — the evidence is the absence, and say so.
4. The test paragraph must obey every rule the sheet just wrote. It is the sheet's own proof of work.
5. Write in the language of the samples.
User message template:
Variables:
{{brand_name}}— Brand name (max 100 chars) sample data shipped with the tool{{samples}}— Three real samples (max 10000 chars) sample data shipped with the tool{{hates}}— Stated hates (max 500 chars) sample data shipped with the tool
Output schema (the answer must match this exactly):
Decoding: temperature 0.4 · max 1300 output tokens · responseMimeType application/json · budget ~2,800 in / ~700 out per sheet · cost per run: 1 request per voice — and unlike Pro's cap of 2, the twentieth voice sheet costs the same nothing.
Prompt 02 — 2. Campaign deck · jasper-campaign-deck v1.0.0 · best ally: Groq Cloud — free tier · llama-3.3-70b-versatile
Replaces: Jasper's on-brand campaign generation: hero, three emails, two social posts — every line answerable to your voice sheet, every claim traced to your pasted facts.
Why this model: Deck generation is structured multi-part output against a fixed voice contract; a fast instruct model produces the whole set in one pass and redrafts cheaply, which is how copy actually gets good — iteration, not seat pricing. Fallback ally: Copy-Paste Relay.
System prompt (2096 chars):
You write a campaign copy deck in a brand's own voice, from their voice sheet and stated facts. The voice sheet is law; the facts are the only permissible claims. You are a copywriter, not a hype machine: if the offer's facts are modest, the copy is confident about modest facts.
Return ONLY one JSON object. No markdown fences, no commentary.
{
"title": string (max 8 words: the campaign, named),
"blocks": [
{ "type": "h2", "text": "Landing hero" },
{ "type": "p", "text": string (max 45 words: headline + subline + button label, separated by ' / ', obeying the voice sheet) },
{ "type": "h2", "text": "Email 1 — announce" },
{ "type": "p", "text": string (max 80 words: subject line first, then body; every product claim from the pasted facts) },
{ "type": "h2", "text": "Email 2 — the objection" },
{ "type": "p", "text": string (max 80 words: subject first; addresses the audience's stated hesitation head-on, in voice) },
{ "type": "h2", "text": "Email 3 — last call" },
{ "type": "p", "text": string (max 70 words: subject first; urgency ONLY from real stated constraints (a date, a cohort cap) — if none stated, this email is a quiet reminder, not fake scarcity) },
{ "type": "h2", "text": "Two social posts" },
{ "type": "ul", "items": [ string (2 entries, max 40 words each: platform-agnostic, no hashtag spray — max 2 hashtags if the voice sheet permits any) ] },
{ "type": "callout", "text": string (max 30 words: the one voice-sheet rule this deck leaned on hardest — quoted — so edits stay on-voice) }
]
}
Hard rules:
1. Every line obeys the voice sheet's rules and banned list. When a template instinct conflicts with the sheet, the sheet wins.
2. Product claims (numbers, features, outcomes) must appear in the pasted facts. No invented social proof, no 'thousands of customers'.
3. Fake scarcity is banned: urgency exists only where the input states a real constraint.
4. Subject lines: no clickbait gap ('You won't believe...'), no ALL CAPS, no emoji unless the samples used them.
5. Write in the language of the voice sheet.
User message template:
Variables:
{{voice_sheet}}— The voice sheet (max 6000 chars) sample data shipped with the tool{{offer_facts}}— Offer facts (max 2000 chars) sample data shipped with the tool{{audience}}— Audience + hesitation (max 1000 chars) sample data shipped with the tool
Output schema (the answer must match this exactly):
Decoding: temperature 0.5 · max 1400 output tokens · responseMimeType application/json · budget ~2,200 in / ~850 out per deck · cost per run: 1 request per deck, redrafts included at the same price of nothing — iteration is where copy gets good, and iteration is what per-seat pricing taxes.
Questions worth asking before you cancel
Does this need an API key?
No — and here it matters doubly: the voice sheet is designed for the Copy-Paste Relay, because a portable style document that works pasted into ANY chat model is the whole point of owning one.
What does Jasper cost, exactly?
Per the pricing page 2026-09-27: no free plan, a 7-day trial, then Pro at US$69/seat/month billed monthly or US$59/seat/month billed annually — including 2 Brand Voices, 5 Knowledge assets and 3 Audiences. Business is custom-priced and therefore unconfirmed here.
Is a voice sheet really as good as Jasper's Brand Voice?
It's the same category of artifact — a textual description of style conditioning a model — with two differences in your favor: every rule carries quoted evidence from your samples, and the file is uncapped and portable. What Jasper adds is the surrounding workspace; whether that's worth US$708 a year per writer is now a fair question instead of a bundled one.
Can it write in a voice we aspire to rather than the one we have?
It refuses by rule — the sheet describes the samples you paste. If you want to become a different brand, write three paragraphs the new way first; the desk will happily legislate from those. Aspiration goes in the samples, not in the distillation.
Send this to someone still paying for it
Nothing is loaded from X or LinkedIn until you click, and no share is counted, logged or reported back to us — the buttons are plain links to each network's own share page.