0saas

Job ticket 765650 · consumer · foldout shop · no subscription

Your resume is free to build and US$25.95 every 4 weeks to hold.

Zety's own pricing page says it plainly: the builder is free, the downloads are TXT-only, and every proper format sits behind Pro at US$25.95 billed every 4 weeks — thirteen times a year — after a US$1.95 trial. This job ticket hands the document to prompts you own: paste your history and the foldout delivers a one-page resume whose every bullet traces to your facts; paste your current resume and the gutter audit typesets the repairs. The result downloads as Markdown — a file nobody can rent back to you.

Zety is a trademark of its owner. This is an independent, unaffiliated comparison built on Zety's own published pricing material, linked below and re-read every thirty days.

Paste the history, press score the foldout, and the sheet spreads — headline, summary, role bullets with their numbers fronted, skills row, and the CUT flap showing what was honestly left out. — rendered in this browser

Source: noneRendered: 0Uploaded to 0saas: nothing

Sample data is illustrative, not a claim about Zety. Every Zety figure on this page comes from the linked pricing page, read 2026-09-27.

The prompt pack

Two prompts, each mapped one-to-one onto a Zety feature you are currently rationed on. Run them from this page with a free key, or copy them into any free chat model — the text is identical either way, and it is printed in full at the bottom of this section so it survives this site.

Loading the pack from tools.json… If this fails, the full prompt text is still readable below.

One-time unlocks only, never a subscription. If a price ever appears here it was read from Stripe in that request, not typed by hand. An unlock is client-side gating, not secure payment verification: it is stored in this browser and cannot prove payment to anyone else.

What Zety's own pricing page says

Read from zety.com/pricing on 2026-09-27. Fields we could not read are marked unconfirmed rather than filled in with a plausible number.

What Zety rents — read from zety.com/pricing on 2026-09-27 — vs this job ticket. — verified 2026-09-27
The jobZety BasicThis pageThis page + a free-tier model
DownloadsTXT onlyMarkdown + print-ready files, yours outrightundefined
Billing rhythmUS$25.95 every 4 weeks behind the paywallNone — two prompts, free-tier modelsundefined
Resume critiqueTemplate suggestionsGutter slugs quoting your lines with repairsundefined
Builder UI · cover lettersThe hosted productNot displaced — paste the sheet into any editorundefined

What this replaces, and what it does not

A displacement claim you cannot substantiate is a lie with good typography. This is the whole scope, including the parts where Zety wins.

A one-page resume draft

Every bullet traced to pasted facts, numbers fronted

A line-by-line audit

Dead phrases, buried numbers and tense slips repaired in the gutter

Files you own

Markdown downloads that open in any editor and print anywhere

No hosted builder

The shop hands you a sheet, not an account

No template gallery

Typography is yours; the sheet pastes into anything

No cover-letter service

One page, honestly folded — letters stay a separate paste

The prompts, in full, as text

Copy these into any model. They are the product; the page around them is convenience. Each block is the exact system prompt the interactive runner sends, plus the user-message template.

Prompt 01 — 1. Fold the one-pager · zety-section-scorer v1.0.0 · best ally: OpenRouter — :free model variants · qwen/qwen3-32b

Replaces: The builder's product: your pasted work history folded into a complete one-page resume — summary, experience, skills — every claim quotable back to your paste.

Why this model: Resume drafting is compression with a strict no-invention contract across sections; a free 32B at low-mid temperature balances the fold (what to keep, what to cut) while tracing every bullet to source. Fallback ally: Groq Cloud — free tier.

System prompt (1527 chars):

You run the foldout shop: the reader pastes their work history and the role they are aiming at. You fold one page — a headline line, a two-sentence summary, experience bullets per role, and a skills row. Every bullet quotes its source fact; nothing is embellished, market-tested adjectives are banned, and the fold must honestly fit a page.

Return ONLY one JSON object. No markdown fences, no commentary, no preamble.

{
  "kicker": string (max 8 words),
  "title": string (max 8 words),
  "subhead": string (max 20 words),
  "items": [
    { "title": string (HEADLINE: the title line. SUMMARY: <= 40 words. ROLE: title is role + org as pasted; body is 2-4 bullets, each one line, fact-first with its outcome. SKILL: the row, grouped. CUT: what the page dropped, with the one-line reason), "tag": string (one of HEADLINE | SUMMARY | ROLE | SKILL | CUT), "body": string }
  ],
  "notes": [ string (one short footnote per run-wide decision) ]
}

Hard rules:
1. Bullets start with a verb and carry a number where the paste provides one; invented metrics are forbidden.
2. Each bullet's fact traces to the paste; scope drift (team results claimed as personal) is corrected in the bullet, not hidden.
3. Summary names years and domain only as pasted; superlatives ('results-driven') are banned house-wide.
4. Skills row groups by Tools / Domain / Methods, using only pasted skills.
5. CUT items name the omitted fact and why it left the one-page fold (oldest, off-target, redundant).
6. Write in the language of the pasted history.

User message template:

Fold my one-pager. The role I am aiming at: {{target}} My work history (roles, dates, what I actually did, numbers where I have them): {{history}}

Variables:

  • {{target}} — Role you're aiming at (max 120 chars) sample data shipped with the tool
  • {{history}} — Your work history (paste) (max 5000 chars) sample data shipped with the tool

Output schema (the answer must match this exactly):

{ "type": "object", "required": [ "blocks" ], "properties": { "title": { "type": "string" }, "blocks": { "type": "array", "minItems": 3, "maxItems": 80 } } }

Decoding: temperature 0.4 · max 2000 output tokens · responseMimeType application/json · budget ~1,400 in / ~900 out · cost per run: 1 request against the free OpenRouter daily pool; the relay floor needs no key at all.

Prompt 02 — 2. Mark the existing foldout · zety-gutter-check v1.0.0 · best ally: Groq Cloud — free tier · llama-3.3-70b-versatile

Replaces: The critique the builder never gives free: your pasted resume marked in the gutter — dead phrases, buried numbers, scope drift — each fix typeset beside its line.

Why this model: Line auditing needs quote-exact spans and surgical fixes with no voice change; a free 70B at low temperature marks only real faults and keeps every rewrite inside the line it repairs. Fallback ally: OpenRouter — :free model variants.

System prompt (1362 chars):

You are the shop's typesetter: the reader pastes their current resume, and you mark it in the gutter — one slug per fault, each quoting the line, naming the fault, and typesetting the repaired line. Faults are dead phrases, buried numbers, responsible-for constructions, and tense slips. A clean resume returns one CLEAN slug naming what already works.

Return ONLY one JSON object. No markdown fences, no commentary, no preamble.

{
  "kicker": string (max 8 words),
  "title": string (max 8 words),
  "subhead": string (max 20 words),
  "items": [
    { "title": string (title quotes the fault span in <= 8 words; body: the fault name, then the repaired line typeset in full, then <= 8 words why it sets better), "tag": string (one of DEAD | BURIED | PASSIVE | TENSE | CLEAN), "body": string }
  ],
  "notes": [ string (one short footnote per run-wide decision) ]
}

Hard rules:
1. DEAD covers responsible for, duties included, team player; the repair names the actual action taken.
2. BURIED covers numbers hidden mid-line; the repair fronts the number.
3. PASSIVE covers was responsible / was involved; the repair starts with the live verb.
4. TENSE covers past roles in present tense or the reverse; name the chronology in the note.
5. Repairs change the line only — facts, numbers and employers carry verbatim.
6. Write slugs in the language of the resume.

User message template:

Mark my resume in the gutter. The resume (paste): {{resume}} The role it targets (one line): {{role}}

Variables:

  • {{resume}} — Your current resume (paste) (max 5000 chars) sample data shipped with the tool
  • {{role}} — Target role (max 120 chars) sample data shipped with the tool

Output schema (the answer must match this exactly):

{ "type": "object", "required": [ "blocks" ], "properties": { "title": { "type": "string" }, "blocks": { "type": "array", "minItems": 3, "maxItems": 80 } } }

Decoding: temperature 0.2 · max 1600 output tokens · responseMimeType application/json · budget ~1,100 in / ~700 out · cost per run: 1 request against Groq's free daily quota; the relay floor needs no key at all.

Questions worth asking before you cancel

Why make a point of 'every 4 weeks'?

Because the pricing page itself states that cadence, and it matters: 52 weeks ÷ 4 = thirteen charges a year, not twelve. Quoting their own card is the fairest way to show the rhythm — and it is recorded verbatim in the linked artifact.

Is a pasted-text resume as good as a builder's?

The judgment layer — what to say, what to cut, which numbers to front — is the same work either way, and here every decision shows its trace. The visual template is the part builders gate; paste this sheet into any doc editor and style it in ten minutes.

What stops the foldout from inventing achievements?

Rules, not vibes: invented metrics are forbidden, scope drift is corrected inside the bullet, and superlatives are banned house-wide. The CUT flap even shows what was dropped — a fabricated resume would find this shop hostile.

Where does my work history go?

Into one request to your free ally and nowhere else — no account, no storage, no renewal date. The download is the only copy, on your disk.

Nothing is loaded from X or LinkedIn until you click, and no share is counted, logged or reported back to us — the buttons are plain links to each network's own share page.

Next on the ledger